<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did the Founders Mean What They Said? Part One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:31:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hercules</title>
		<link>http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html/comment-page-1#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Hercules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoundationforum.com/?p=199#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Hi Jean, and thanks for your comment. I’m glad it made sense to you.

For your convenience, I will discuss the template issue on your own blog, so you don’t have to jump around so many links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jean, and thanks for your comment. I’m glad it made sense to you.</p>
<p>For your convenience, I will discuss the template issue on your own blog, so you don’t have to jump around so many links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akagaga</title>
		<link>http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html/comment-page-1#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>akagaga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoundationforum.com/?p=199#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Well done, Herky. I read it before, but today it made more sense. Could it be that my mind is more alert first thing in the morning?

I do have a completely unrelated question. Where did you get the template for this blog? With my new computer, I’ve discovered that mine has completely different colors than I thought, so I’m going to change it. As long as I’m doing that, I would very much like to go to a 3-column format like you have, but I don’t know where to find it. Help me out, new buddy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Herky. I read it before, but today it made more sense. Could it be that my mind is more alert first thing in the morning?</p>
<p>I do have a completely unrelated question. Where did you get the template for this blog? With my new computer, I’ve discovered that mine has completely different colors than I thought, so I’m going to change it. As long as I’m doing that, I would very much like to go to a 3-column format like you have, but I don’t know where to find it. Help me out, new buddy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hercules Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html/comment-page-1#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Hercules Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoundationforum.com/?p=199#comment-592</guid>
		<description>I’m glad that it was. My apologies, I was worried at first, because I never took the time to re-read and proof-read it. So I’m glad it turned out fine. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m glad that it was. My apologies, I was worried at first, because I never took the time to re-read and proof-read it. So I’m glad it turned out fine. <img src='http://thefoundationforum.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cato</title>
		<link>http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html/comment-page-1#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Cato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoundationforum.com/?p=199#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Thank you for responding; yes that clarification is sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for responding; yes that clarification is sufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hercules Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html/comment-page-1#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Hercules Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoundationforum.com/?p=199#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Hi Cato, thanks for taking the time to read and to comment. I appreciate it.

It took me a while to understand what Adams was getting at by that portion of his quote too (only I wasn’t distracted by pizza :) ). However, I think what he was trying to say was that, the most basic principles of Christianity and liberty were understood by all Christians of all denominations, and even non-Christians, understood what those principles were. That doesn’t however mean that they all believed them. Adams wasn’t ignorant enough to make that kind of insinuation.

My point was 1) Adams was NOT saying that atheists, et. al, could hold the “general principles of Christianity,” and 2) Adams was saying that both the general principles of Christianity and the general principles of American and English liberty, formed the basis of the Founding. The fact that non-Christians were listening in the crowd, and would understand what he meant, is of little consequence to that statement itself.

He was speaking to a group of young men, who were honoring Adams and Jefferson for their role in establishing American independence, according to the context of this letter. These young men were probably not of the same generation that fought the Revolution, since they were apparently “young” 30 years after it ended. They were merely commemorating what the previous generation had accomplished. Adams was merely clarifying and specifying the “principles handed down by our ancestors” which had given momentum to the Cause. I think that’s what he was doing.

I hope that satisfactorily answers your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cato, thanks for taking the time to read and to comment. I appreciate it.</p>
<p>It took me a while to understand what Adams was getting at by that portion of his quote too (only I wasn’t distracted by pizza <img src='http://thefoundationforum.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). However, I think what he was trying to say was that, the most basic principles of Christianity and liberty were understood by all Christians of all denominations, and even non-Christians, understood what those principles were. That doesn’t however mean that they all believed them. Adams wasn’t ignorant enough to make that kind of insinuation.</p>
<p>My point was 1) Adams was NOT saying that atheists, et. al, could hold the “general principles of Christianity,” and 2) Adams was saying that both the general principles of Christianity and the general principles of American and English liberty, formed the basis of the Founding. The fact that non-Christians were listening in the crowd, and would understand what he meant, is of little consequence to that statement itself.</p>
<p>He was speaking to a group of young men, who were honoring Adams and Jefferson for their role in establishing American independence, according to the context of this letter. These young men were probably not of the same generation that fought the Revolution, since they were apparently “young” 30 years after it ended. They were merely commemorating what the previous generation had accomplished. Adams was merely clarifying and specifying the “principles handed down by our ancestors” which had given momentum to the Cause. I think that’s what he was doing.</p>
<p>I hope that satisfactorily answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cato</title>
		<link>http://thefoundationforum.com/2008/08/did-founders-mean-what-they-said-part.html/comment-page-1#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Cato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoundationforum.com/?p=199#comment-589</guid>
		<description>The quote you use– the second one (“Who composed the army…”) doesn;t quite make sense to me. But then again I am distracted by the fine pizza I am eating.

However, what Adams SEEMS to be saying is that DESPITE atheists and etc, they were ALL educated in the general principals or Christianity/liberty, and thus prepared for the war for liberty. Is this what you are saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote you use– the second one (“Who composed the army…”) doesn;t quite make sense to me. But then again I am distracted by the fine pizza I am eating.</p>
<p>However, what Adams SEEMS to be saying is that DESPITE atheists and etc, they were ALL educated in the general principals or Christianity/liberty, and thus prepared for the war for liberty. Is this what you are saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

